Published on June 17, 2026
By Patricia Vance, Legal Education Reporter | October 30, 2026 | California State Bar Policies
SAN FRANCISCO — California State Bar Committee of Bar Examiners Chair Brandon Thompson announced a formal review of licensing standards Monday after online commentators heavily criticized the grading of the July exam. This decision followed viral social media posts detailing a high-profile candidate who narrowly missed the required passing score on several written california bar exam questions.
Outside the California Supreme Court building on McAllister Street, where newly licensed attorneys are sworn in during autumn ceremonies, the rigor of these testing standards is a frequent subject of debate. Scholars and practitioners argue whether the current format accurately measures practical lawyering skills.
The written portion of the licensing test consists of five essay questions and one performance test designed to measure analytical skills under intense time constraints. Public discussions surrounding the grading criteria intensified after an Instagram video detailed the scoring frustrations of an apprentice candidate who fell just short of a passing mark.
"We must ensure that our grading rubric remains fair, objective, and consistent across all testing sessions," Thompson said in a statement released Monday. He confirmed that the bar is reviewing its double-grading protocols for candidates whose scores fall within a few points of the passing threshold.
Critics of the exam argue that the current format emphasizes rote memorization over the practical skills needed to practice law. They suggest that the essay prompts often test obscure legal rules that attorneys rarely encounter without access to research materials.
Candidates can read about the public debate over celebrity score failures to understand how these grading policies affect public perception. This scrutiny has led to calls for greater transparency in how essay examiners are trained and monitored.
In response to these criticisms, several states are planning to transition to the NextGen bar exam, which focuses on client counseling, legal research, and writing. This new format aims to test candidate competence through realistic scenarios rather than theoretical essays.
However, California has not yet fully committed to adopting the new national format, preferring to evaluate its own state-specific options. This delay has caused concern among local law school deans who want to prepare their students for a consistent testing experience.
Advocates for diversity in the legal profession point out that the high cost of preparation and the low pass rate disproportionately affect minority and low-income candidates. They argue that alternative study paths, such as the Law Office Study Program, are essential for maintaining a diverse bar.
"The exam should not act as an arbitrary barrier to entry for qualified candidates," said Civil Rights Attorney Elena Martinez. Martinez supports reforms that would allow candidates to demonstrate their competence through practical portfolios rather than a single multi-day exam.
The Committee of Bar Examiners plans to compile a detailed report on the July grading cycle to identify any potential bias or inconsistency in essay scoring. This report will be presented to the California Supreme Court for review early next year.
Any approved changes to the grading system would likely be implemented for the July testing session. Until then, candidates must continue to prepare using traditional study guides and essay templates.
How are essay responses graded on the California bar exam?
Each essay on the California bar exam is graded on a scale of forty to one hundred points by trained examiners who follow a specific grading rubric for each question. Responses that receive a score of sixty-five or higher are generally considered to be of passing quality, demonstrating a solid understanding of the legal issues and a logical analysis of the facts.
What is the purpose of the Performance Test section of the exam?
The Performance Test is a ninety-minute section designed to measure a candidate's ability to handle a practical legal task using a file of factual documents and a library of legal authorities. Candidates must draft a document such as a legal brief, client letter, or memorandum, demonstrating skills in analysis, writing, and problem-solving under tight time constraints.
How can candidates challenge their scores if they suspect a grading error?
California does not allow candidates to appeal their scores or request a regrade after the final results are released. The state bar utilizes a comprehensive double-grading system for all candidates whose total scores are close to the passing threshold, ensuring that every borderline paper is reviewed by multiple examiners before a final decision is made.
Newstrix
Bar Exam News
Get the latest updates on bar exam changes, announcements, and important deadlines
delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter signup is protected by Google reCAPTCHA. See Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.